Editorial

Editorial Policy

PulsarMS publishes reaction-time measurement content for users who want practical benchmarks without false precision. This policy describes how claims should be written and corrected.

Claim standards

• Browser results should be described as browser-observed timing, not pure neural timing.
• Audio results should be labeled relative unless the output path is calibrated.
• Hardware claims should distinguish device latency from human reaction time.
• Product recommendations should disclose affiliate relationships.
• Scientific claims should link to primary or reputable secondary sources when possible.

Corrections

If a page overstates a timing claim, misses a caveat, or cites a weak source, it should be corrected. Correction requests should include the page URL, the exact claim, and a stronger source or reproducible test case.

Review cycle

Methodology and benchmark pages should be reviewed when browser APIs, display technology, audio-device behavior, or PulsarMS scoring logic changes.

Start with how we measure for the technical standard behind the site.